March 22, 2009

Creating Social Media for Indie Film Marketing

The purpose of this post is to explain how to market your indie movie correctly and avoid some of the mistakes I’ve made. This is a practical piece but it helps to understand the reasoning behind my suggestions. I’ve spent a couple of years now investigating and experimenting with social media on my own movies and not always getting it right! Much of the research and exploration I’ve done has been inspired by Henry Jenkin’s whitepaper on spreadable media, from the Workbook Project and a mountain of social media presentations on SlideShare!

I’m going to assume that as indie filmmakers (a) you don’t have thousands of dollars to spend on advertising campaigns (although more on this in a later post) and hence (b) that you want to use word-of-mouth to make people aware of the movie ahead of it being seen.

So here it is: You have to create marketing materials – social media – that make a contribution to a person’s (online) social life. Audiences don’t build their world around your movie or your marketing materials - they take your movie and media use it for their own (social) purposes. That means (borrowing from Jenkin’s paper) you have to create media that allows your audience to:

  • express something about themselves or their community
  • express a deeply held perception or view of the world
  • determine who’s in and who’s out
  • conduct some kind of social function – like sharing, referring, alerting, gossiping, debating (etc.)

The problem with the usual trailer and movie poster is they can only work in this way if you’ve got the kudos built into the project from the beginning – like a named cast or named director, maybe a popular franchise. Then those well-known elements all bring a message or meaning which fans use to express themselves. And, media built on these elements has a social worth as a gift or tribute.

For example, if I decorate my MySpace or Facebook page with a poster from Old Boy or La Haine, it’s communicating something about me – I’m using the poster not to promote the film but to signal the type of person that I am and the people I’m interested to meet. Similarly, if I forward the link to a trailer to a friend, I’m doing it to reinforce the friendship because I think this gesture or “gift” will be appreciated and they’ll think kindly towards me. It’s not really because I want to promote the film (unless I know the filmmakers of course), it's what the trailer is doing for me.

So, if you’ve got an indie film that nobody’s heard of, your trailer isn't punching at the same weight – your trailer and poster are not performing those necessary social functions in the same way or as effectively. Worse still, until there’s a body of opinion that says your film isn’t lame, whoever carries your colors is going out on a limb under the threat of ridicule from the community. Not everyone’s ready to do that.

What to do?
First, recognize that you’ve got a problem. Second, break down all the elements in your film that you do have – start with the cast, the crew, the genre, the premise and the subject matter. Maybe the special effects, stunts, car chases? Look for all the things in your film that can contribute to various people's (social) life and perform one or all of the roles above. Third and finally, think how you’re going to make it easy and convenient to facilitate all those functions – the sharing, the referring, the debating etc.

creating better marketing materials


Don’t think about it as though you’re selling or promoting the movie: you’re trying to add value to someone’s life by giving them a piece of media that they can use for their purposes. If your media doesn’t do that then its spam.

So, for example, if you’ve got a great car chase or a great stunt, upload that clip to YouTube and find people interested in cars. It doesn’t matter that your film is a crime thriller or a horror and not really about cars at all, it’s got that chase and that clip can form the basis for social interaction – it’s a gift from you to the car community. Avoid at all costs spoiling the video with urls and logos – put that information in the description field. If it looks like an advert then it’ll spoil the value of the gift.

The media needn't be a clip or graphic, it could be an opinion piece, a comment on someone's blog, insider information (gossip) - any form of communication that adds value.

A point to note when uploading to YouTube (and other video sharing sites of course) is to give the video a title that reflects what’s in the clip, not the name of the movie. So in this case, it might be called “Car Chase on Wet Road” – it’s much more likely to be found by people looking for car chases. They’re not going to search for the name of your film because as yet nobody’s heard of it. You can actually see this at work with London Voodoo: a fan, without my knowledge or blessing, ripped the DVD and uploaded a collection of clips titled “Woman Possessed”. His video views far exceeded our “London Voodoo Trailer” because he tapped into the popular search term “possession” and into a subculture of people interested in possessed women.

Now, of course you’ll want a trailer and a poster but these are there to provide further information or increased involvement for anyone who wants to take their interest to the next level.

Please stay tuned for more in subsequent posts. I've started here with the assumption that your movie is already finished but I'd like to discuss how you might approach the project differently from the beginning now that you know this. And I'll discuss the media we created and why it worked and when it didn't.

March 20, 2009

Postmodern Horror

In my attempt this year to post more content that’s helpful to folk, I’m delighted to make available Dr. Dean Lockwood’s stolen lecture notes:) Dr. Lockwood is Senior Lecturer in Media Theory at the University of Lincoln.

I've got hold of these notes because he makes reference to MindFlesh and gives what I think is a pretty cool analysis – but more on this later.

The lecture notes discuss a popular horror topic which is how horror reflects or is influenced by the social and cultural changes of the time. I particularly like this paper because it discusses the growth of paranoid horror from what he describes as “secure horror” (I’ve reproduced his table below so you can easily see the difference).  References include The Thing  - one of my favourite movies - which is seen to be informed by the paranoia of the Vietnam war (nobody knows who’s friend or foe) .

There’s also an interesting discussion of Gothic horror in today’s world which I think provides some interesting tips for anyone writing a vampire novel or movie right now.

Secure Horror

Paranoid Horror

Successful human intervention

Failed human intervention

Effective expertise

Ineffective expertise

Authorities as legitimate

Authorities as unreliable

Sustainable order

Escalating disorder

‘External’ threats

‘Internal’ threats

Centre-periphery organisation

Victim groups organisation

Defined boundaries

Diffuse boundaries

Closed narratives

Open narratives

Oh yeah, here’s that MindFlesh write-up:

the central male protagonist obsessively surrenders to fantasy erotic visitations by an alluring succubus, sex with whom is violent, connoted as traumatic and abusive rather than innocently pleasurable. These episodes are related to guilty (and unreliable) memories of abuse at the hands of the protagonist’s mother (there is a strong resonance with Creed’s notions of the monstrous feminine) and it becomes clear that they are not purely fantasy, but have the ability to bleed through into the real physical world in various ways, including manifestations on the protagonist’s body. The film emphasizes the permeability of mind and body, fantasy and reality, focusing paranoiacally on the irruption of a more violent and indifferent universe and the material force of psychopathological (or demonic) impulses. In this film, it is as if the mind were itself become demonic.

December 19, 2008

Excellent review at HorrorNews.net

Delighted with our review at HorrorNews.net - please check it out.

December 05, 2008

YouTube vs Vimeo in HD

So YouTube finally got around to offering video in HD! I quicky uploaded a HD clip to both YouTube and Vimeo to compare the two. Check them out for yourself, I think they both compare ok.

The only thing that constantly bothers me is that rendering out to H.264 in Premiere always alters the gamma and shifts the blacks into grey.. agghhhhh!!!

The actual upload format for these clips was 1280x720p at 10Mb/s.

Oh, and a tip I found was to include "&fmt=22" at the end of the YouTube clip URL to be sure the video starts in HD

YouTube HD

Vimeo HD


December 01, 2008

Free MINDFLESH screening at Twitch

That's right people, MindFlesh can be seen for free at movie site Twitch any time between Dec 12th, 13th and 14th.

Here's the link: http://twitchfilm.net/site/view/mindflesh-is-coming/

Please enjoy and pass along the good news! You can also DIGG IT.

November 15, 2008

The Don and Murph Show

If you haven't seen the Don & Murph show yet then shame on you! :) It's a very cool movie site where the two guiys mix movie reviews with comedy - and they're into horror movies.

I'm delighted to say we just got  exposed on their regular weekly feature What's In Our Box?

Check out this clip and start subscribing!


November 10, 2008

Number of horror films released in the past 10 years

Looks like 2007 was the peak for horror movie making with films tagged as "horror" on the IMDB accounting for 17% of all movies released last year.
Of course 2008 hasn't finished yet but IMDB shows only 11 films completed but not released so looks like number of horror movies this year has declined.

November 02, 2008

Why & How We Chose to Self-Distribute Our Film - Part 1

Where We Are Now 
MindFlesh went on sale to the public last week. We're selling a 2-disc special edition DVD via Amazon & CreateSpace and the movie can also be downloaded via Caachi to personal computers and portable devices.
The film in all formats is DRM-free (except via Caachi's streaming service). Later this year the movie will be available on other download and streaming sites and a couple of video-on-demand (VoD) pay-per-view TV channels in Europe.
 
Anyone discovering the film on Amazon, a download site or VoD will have no idea or reason to care that we're self-distributing the movie. Potential customers can watch our trailer or various clips from the movie and they can read our excellent reviews. On the MindFlesh site I've tried to provide as much information as possible for the viewer to make an informed decision about whether they'll like the film before they buy.
 
This blog post is about how we got to this position. In subsequent posts I'll discuss the various marketing activities we have underway and their relative merits.
 
Should I Self-Publish My Work?
In any other industry except book publishing and movies, cutting out the middleman would be viewed as a good thing! Why give away x% of your revenue if you don't have to? And yet there seems to be some kind of stigma about self-published works - as though those who choose this route do so only to satisfy their vanity or because they weren't good enough to get a "real" distribution/publishing deal.
It was great to see that Lance Hammer took his Sundance film Ballast and decided to self-distribute it because maybe this will encourage a change in perception.
 
My usual response is, talk to people who have distribution deals and ask if they're happy with the money they're making or if they're happy with the marketing the distributor/publisher is doing. Very few will tell you they are. Many authors I know that are with big publishers still find themselves working hard to promote their own work. Why not take that little extra step and cut out the middleman? Cut out the distributor and speak directly to your audience? The problem of course is knowledge & resources to do the promotion and distribution efficiently (e.g. to sell the book or film with the minimum time and money).

 
Market Background - Independent Films
After the success of London Voodoo on DVD (now available in five languages and 21 countries; and we also had a small theatrical release in USA and Singapore) I'd been planning to sell MindFlesh to various distributors around the world for a minimum guarantee and then walk away. Approaching and selling to distributors is very easy - they're looking for product they can sell and they're open to any film that might make them money. It's a simple as that and it should be. So what changed?
 
Well, several things happened or increased in prevalence over the two years if to took to shoot and post-produce MindFlesh:
  •  Internet piracy is stealing DVD sales - why buy the DVD if you can download it for free?
  •  NetFlix, LoveFilm and other rental companies that offer "all you can eat" subscription-type services have reduced DVD sales - particular for independent titles that have always been seen by the public as a bit of risk
  •  user-generated video sharing sites like YouTube are satisfying viewers' needs for original content. Further, because there is so much to trawl through, it's created what some have called a new "Attention Economy" where everyone publishing any kind of content is struggling to get some of the viewer's time.
 
The result of this has been a huge reduction in the number of DVDs purchased.
This in turn has meant that those most likely to sell are the Hollywood titles and those other titles with big marketing budgets that buy attention through print, cinema and TV advertising. 
Hence:
  • the big retail outlets now only carry a narrow range of titles. (For more information about what's happening in retail, watch this video or visit the "Save the Indies" MySpace page)
  • independent DVD distributors have gone bust because of lost sales through piracy, subscription-based rental and they're squeezed out of retail outlets.

Some people may be able to point to exceptions of course - smaller titles in a Virgin Megastore for example -  but these titles come from the bigger distributors that have long-standing relationships, a bigger library of titles and hence more leverage – "take our turkeys" they might demand "or you won't get the better titles". This bundling of dross with gloss happens everywhere – in TV and in film festivals: take these weaker titles or you don't get the titles you want. It further squeezes out the indie.

The bottom line for us then is that the market for indie films is smaller and more risk-adverse. We knew going in that MindFlesh was never going to be an easy sell because we set out to make something completely original: it doesn't fall into a neat pigeon hole because it's part sci-fi, part horror with a storyline that allows parallel interpretations because it's a film about parallel realities. It's based on an excellent Buddhist horror novel, White Light
 
We screened in Cannes and although many distributors loved the film they confided "I don't know how I'm going to sell it".
Of course we'd anticipated some distributors reacting in this way but had hoped to sign with some niche distributors who sell kinda fetish/art-house/genre cross-over titles. But in a smaller market (by which I mean less money being spent) these guys are going bust. For for the bigger distributors still in business it's not about "good films" vs "bad films", it's about "sell same product to known (but dwindling) audience" vs "sell something unusual to a hybrid audience" - they can't be bothered to take the trouble. 
Sure we have a niche audience but the audience for MindFlesh is very easy to identify - it's those people who like films by David Cronenberg, some of those who like David Lynch and some Buddhists. Look at Cronenberg's fans - they're not all horror fans or all sci-fi fans; some would just say that they're fans of great cinema.
 
Thankfully we'd anticipated this outcome from the moment we signed up the book rights which means we'd already started our audience building long before we'd started shooting, never mind selling.
 
Coming Next
In the second part of this blog posting I'll discuss all our social media audience building work including our YouTube blogs, widget building, newsletters, MySpace page, Facebook application and so on.





July 23, 2008

Mobile Content

Wow, once again it's been a while!

I've been hard at work creating Google video ads and experimenting with Google adwords - nothing to to with the film business but for a family villa in Florida. Plus I've been playing with Flash Lite and developing some MindFlesh-related content.

For example, there are now a couple of animated screensavers (or wallpapers) that will work on any Flash Lite 1.1 enabled phones - which is pretty much most of the more recent cellphones. I've tested them in Adobe's Device Central and on a couple of phones - my Nokia 6500 and a Sony Ericsson W850i.

Here they are :) They can be downloaded from the main MindFlesh site - click the menu item "downloads".

   

Here's a couple of mobiles wallpapers too. Again, more at the main MindFlesh site.

  

Oh, and I shouldn't forget that I've created an iPhone-specific page for MindFlesh. It's not as content-rich as the main site but does allow access to the basics. The main site homepage checks the UserAgent property and switches to the correct page. Here's a look at it on my iPhone.

June 07, 2008

MindFlesh in San Francisco

So last night was our USA premiere of MindFlesh in San Francisco at The Roxie down in the Mission district.

What a great turn-out and what a great audience reaction. I'd checked ticket pre-sales the day before and was delighted we'd managed to hit the top spot. So, with my expectations set, it was nice to see a packed theatre.

Regards the technical aspects of the screening, the sound was pretty good but the projected image looked darker than it should and I need to check if it's our tape or their projector. At the screenings in Cannes the image transferred from the hard drive to tape was too bright for some reason but I'm worried the post-production guys have gone too far in their corrections - last night was the first time I'd seen the NTSC version (the film is mastered in HD and txferd to NTSC digiBeta for last night).

My wife Helen and my nephew Anthony were there last night too. Here's some of Anthony's video work in the form of some audience feedback.

I was delighted to screen with Imp Of Satan which is an excellent short film (30 mins). It opens with some mesmerizing shots of SF's Castro and similarly scary/hypnotic music. All the direction, acting and photography is absolutely great. Check out the movie if you get a chance....

For those that came last night, and others I guess, here's the link to Bill's novel on Amazon.

NEXT SCREENING

MindFlesh plays for a second time in San Francisco on Tuesday 17th June 2008, 7:15pm. Again we're preceded with Imp Of Satan but be sure to catch both films - IOS is great.